Message Rain
  • Home
  • About us
    • Legal Entity & Privacy Policy
  • Books
    • a man wearing a dress >
      • About This Book
      • Ordering
      • Excerpts
      • Study Guide
      • Note from the author
      • Bookseller Info
      • Promotional Items
    • Still Life (without the vase)
    • Poetry Looks at Itself
  • Events
    • Workshops
    • Scheduling
  • Blogs
    • Announcements
    • Gender Blog
    • Topic Blog
    • Good News Department
    • Inner Blog
  • Other Products
    • Stickers
    • T-Shirts
    • Buttons
  • Our Messages
    • I don't blame you
    • Please
    • That takes ovaries!
    • Sacred Sexuality
    • We blame Glenn!
  • Support
  • Sister Sites
  • Contact Us

Reaching Across the Divide

1/11/2017

7 Comments

 
This morning, I watched some of the press conference being held by the President Elect.  I had never actually watched him speak at length before.  I had only seen clips of him on the news, and a little of the debates, really.

Now he was the main focus.  There were no other candidates to wait for or to compete against.  He won the election.  He was it.

At first, I just listened to the content of the questions and his answers.  After awhile, I began to notice more and more about his presentation, the way he spoke and gestured no matter which question he was answering.  I watched him hold his right finger up while talking, as if instructing a room full of school children.  I heard him repeat certain words twice, as he often does.  I observed his use of superlatives and absolutes, such as “excellent” or “great” or “smartest” or “the best” when describing his nominees or his associates.

Suddenly, I realized something.  Actually, I felt something.  I reflected on how I felt back in school myself, being assaulted by bullies on the playground.  I was so full of anger and rage and desire for revenge that I thought I would explode.  But I was much smaller and weaker than they were.  And I was only one boy, but they were in a pack.  So I couldn’t really fight back.

Later, in bed at night, I imagined what it would be like to just kill them.  Not with a gun, but just pound them to death with my own fists, to express the sheer fury and rage I felt inside.  I knew that I could never actually murder anybody.  It was just a fantasy, but it was a fervent one.

So, here I was watching the President Elect on TV.  He was very serious.  He was correcting a reporter.  “We are going to build a wall,” he said.  Not a fence.  A wall.  Suddenly I seemed to sense the feeling he was projecting.  Here was a man who just gotten elected president who seemed just as filled with rage and revenge as I had been as a boy on the school yard.  This was more than a policy decision, it was an urge to fight back.  Fight back against all the people and things that it seemed had been bullying him and many of those who voted for him, for a long time.

And they had had it.  They had reached their limit.  They were fed up.  They were beyond wasting any more time in debate.  His presence on stage during the campaign had mirrored this feeling.  They voted for him for many different reasons, of course.  But one of those reasons was that this man was someone, perhaps the first person in a long time, who was ‘on their side’ on the school yard of this country.  They had felt bullied over and over again and didn’t see any way out.  Finally, now there was a way.  Vote for Donald Trump.

And yes, they were in the minority.  Not just in comparison to voters for Hillary Clinton, but in comparison to all voters.  After all, only about 25% of US residents over age 18 actually voted for Donald Trump.  The rest voted for somebody else or didn’t vote at all, for various reasons.  So Trump voters were in a distinct minority, just in numbers alone.  But beyond that, they seemed to be in a minority when it came to the press and news channels.  The main stream press looked as if it was on the side of those who were ignoring them and their concerns.  And in Congress, their elected representatives were in a minority when compared to the Democrats and the ‘establishment’ Republicans, when taken together.

Well, they wouldn’t be ignored this time!  Their guy got elected and no amount of finagling of the electoral college or recount efforts had changed that.

I thought back to why I had felt so enraged when I was young.  I realized that it wasn’t just being bullied but because I had no way out.  School was compulsory, so I couldn’t run away.  The teachers mostly had the attitude of ‘let them settle it among themselves,’ unless someone drew blood.  My parents were both ineffectual.  Nobody would really help me.  Adults were full of suggestions about what to say or how to ‘just ignore them,’ but I was too sensitive for that.  It seemed that no one could truly listen to me or understand how I felt.

So what do you do if you’re an adult in the USA who is under paid, overworked, or out of a job altogether?  What if you tried to go to college but found out that it was wrong for you, leaving you with no degree and staggering debt?  What if the world around you has changed so much, so fast, that you feel as if you can hardly recognize your own country anymore?  What if nobody seems to care about you or be willing to help you? What options do you have left?
§ § §
I’m left with this question.  Perhaps you have the same question.  Am I practicing unfair discrimination?  I’ve worked hard during my lifetime to accept people of color, people with disabilities, different religions, and so on.  Now my challenge goes beyond that.  How can I listen to and understand the feelings of people who are not in my ‘echo chamber’ of ‘liberal’ positions?  People who think ‘global warming’ is a hoax or that immigrants have taken all their jobs, when I don’t necessarily agree with them?


I think I need a number of things to do that.  First, I imagine that I need to find a way, within myself, to shift from an arguing, contentious posture to one of listening and understanding.  To change from trying to convince someone to a sense of genuine openness and search for a common humanity - how we are alike as well as not alike.  Second, what can I say to let them know that I’m not going to beat them over the head with my point of view?  That they can trust me?  Third, where do I go to find a few such people to talk with in a calm surrounding?  And finally, how can I keep my cool when someone says something that rings such a sour note to me that I’m tempted to challenge their opinion without thinking?  What if we need a facilitator or a forum of some kind to provide sort of a relief valve to ‘blow off steam’ when the feelings come up, without attacking each other?


I’m trying to finish writing a book.  What I’ve said here is partly what the book is about.  Until I finish it, I’m not ready to spend significant time on other projects or volunteer work.  Yet I couldn’t help myself.  I sat down to write this anyway.


Tomorrow is another day.  Soon, my book will be done, edited, and published.  And then, I may be traveling around to various places to read from it, take questions, and sign copies. And I will likely end up in places where I’m in the minority.  After all, I’ll be a man wearing a dress.
7 Comments
Gerilyn Sestok
1/13/2017 07:48:28 am

All great points to establish mature connection with those we disagree with. Hard to do in practice. It also seems people who differ from us are locked into their belief. Processing information with an open mind with someone of different beliefs take two patient people who are not run by their egos. It doesn't appear to happen much.

Reply
Glenn C. Koenig link
1/13/2017 09:55:59 am

Geri, I hear your sense of doubt about this. My thought is that most people who are 'locked into' their beliefs are doing so because they fear a loss of certainty in their lives, and are suspicious of other people who may attempt to destroy that certainty through argument. I imagine that I may be somewhat 'locked in' to a few positions myself, at least.
For someone who seems to present an extreme attachment to a position on an issue, my guess is that just listening to them without contradicting them would help. Especially if they might judge me as being opposed to their beliefs, initially. The idea that someone would just listen - see them as another human being who is a valid person who happens to have a different opinion from their own, might be a refreshingly new experience for them! For any of us, for that matter.
The goal isn't necessarily to change someone's view on the issues, but to get to that very need for certainty that underlies their attachment to those views. To say, "Look, I'm human, you're human, neither of us has to 'win' anything - let's just explore what we think about things and keep a sense of respect each other." In other words, I think perhaps healing comes first, policy decisions come later, instead of the other way around.

Reply
Michael Trachtman
1/13/2017 03:11:07 pm

Minor point.

"Trump voters were in a distinct minority" based on being less than 25% of eligible voters.

That makes Hillary voters also in the distinct minority. The best numbers I find are 232 million eligible voters. Slightly under 66 million voters voted for Hillary. Slightly under 62 million voters voted for Donald.

Thus, voters for Hillary, by your criteria are "in a distinct minority".

Actually, by my computation, 66/232 is about 28%. 62/232 is about 27%, so they are both actually above your arbitrary 25% of all eligible voters criteria. I presume you do not want to count people, such as children, who are not eligible to vote.

I find this criteria bogus. Not that I know the right criteria.

I also don't know what the word "distinct" means in this context.

Also, since there were about (according to wikipedia) a total of approximately 137 million total actual votes, then both of them did not receive 50% of the actual vote. Donald had approx 46% of the actual votes, while Hillary had 48% of the actual vote. The remaining 6% or so went elsewhere.

Most of this data comes from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2016#Results

I like your ideas. I find the concept of "distinct" minority for people who both got close, but less than 50% of the actual vote, and close but less than 25% of the actual vote - to be misleading and with little meaning. I would accept that a "distinct minority" voted for Johnson, Stein, McMullin or Castle, as they all had less than 5% of the actual vote.

Reply
Michael Trachtman
1/13/2017 03:15:06 pm

I really liked what you wrote. Number analysis aside.

Yes.. The key is to listen. My experience is that, like you noticed, that Donald speaks in a different dialect of English. One that is understood by the people of middle america who are fed up like you describe.

It's sort of when people who love jazz don't get heavy metal, and those who love rap don't get the blues. It's a different language. When you try to interpret jazz from the perspective of blues, or classical music from the perspective of classical, nothing makes sense.

Thank you Glenn.

Reply
Michael Trachtman
1/13/2017 03:17:32 pm

OOPS.

I meant "When you try to interpret jazz from the perspective of heavy metal or classical from the perspective of rap, nothing makes sense".

Reply
Michael Trachtman
1/13/2017 03:15:54 pm

Should be "or classical music from the perspective of rap" ...

Reply
Glenn C. Koenig link
1/13/2017 07:34:42 pm

Thank you for your thoughts, Michael.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Glenn Koenig is the manager of this and other web sites, an author, video producer, database designer, and volunteer.

    Archives

    October 2020
    August 2019
    July 2019
    January 2019
    October 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    March 2016
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly